|
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| index.js | ||
| InstanceMetadata.js | ||
| Metadata.js | ||
| OHIFInstanceMetadata.js | ||
| OHIFSeriesMetadata.js | ||
| OHIFStudyMetadata.js | ||
| README.md | ||
| SeriesMetadata.js | ||
| StudyMetadata.js | ||
| StudySummary.js | ||
| WadoRsMetaDataBuilder.js | ||
Study Metadata Module
This module defines the API/Data-Model by which OHIF Viewerbase package and possibly distinct viewer implementations can access studies metadata. This module does not attempt to define any means of loading study metadata from any data end-point but only how the data that has been previously loaded into the application context will be accessed by any of the routines or algorithm implementations that need the data.
Intro
For various reasons like sorting, grouping or simply rendering study information, OHIF Viewerbase package and applications depending on it usually have the need to access study metadata. Before the current initiative there was no uniform way of achieving that since each implementation provides study metadata on its own specific ways. The application and the package itself needed to have a deep knowledge of the data structures provided by the data endpoint to perform any of the operations mentioned above, meaning that any data access code needed to be adapted or rewritten.
The intent of the current module is to provide a fairly consistent and flexible API/Data-Model by which OHIF Viewerbase package (and different viewer implementations that depend on it) can manipulate DICOM matadata retrieved from distinct data end points (e.g., a proprietary back end servers) in uniform ways with minor to no modifications needed.
Implementation
The current API implementation defines three classes of objects:
StudyMetadata, SeriesMetadata and InstanceMetadata. Inside OHIF Viewerbase
package, every access to Study, Series or SOP Instance metadata is achieved by
the interface exposed by these three classes. By inheriting from them and
overriding or extending their methods, different applications with different
data models can adapt even the most peculiar data structures to the uniform
interface defined by those classes. Together these classes define a flexible and
extensible data manipulation layer leaving routines and algorithms that depend
on that data untouched.
Design Decisions & "Protected" Members
In order to provide for good programming practices, attributes and methods meant to be used exclusively by the classes themselves (for internal purposes only) were written with an initial '_' character, being thus treated as "protected" members. The idea behind this practice was never to hide them from the programmers (what makes debugging tasks painful) but only advise for something that's not part of the official public API and thus should not be relied on. Usage of "protected" members makes the code less readable and prone to compatibility issues.
As an example, the initial implementation of the StudyMetadata class defined
the attribute _studyInstanceUID and the method getStudyInstanceUID. This
implies that whenever the StudyInstanceUID of a given study needs to be
retrieved the getStudyInstanceUID method should be called instead of directly
accessing the attribute _studyInstanceUID (which might not even be populated
since getStudyInstanceUID can be possiblity overriden by a subclass to satisfy
specific implementation needs, leaving the attribute _studyInstanceUID
unused).
Ex:
let studyUID = myStudy.getStudyInstanceUID(); // GOOD! :-)
[ ... ]
let otherStudyUID = anotherStudy._studyInstanceUID; // BAD... :-(
Another important topic is the preference of methods over attributes on the public API. This design decision was made to ensure extensibility and flexibility (methods are extensible while standalone attributes are not, and can be adapted – through overrides, for example – to support even the most peculiar data models) even though the overhead a few additional function calls may incur.
Abstract Classes
Some classes defined in this module are "abstract" classes (even though
JavaScript does not officially support such programming facility). They are
abstract in the sense that a few methods (very important ones, by the way)
were left "blank" (unimplemented, or more precisely implemented as empty NOP
functions) in order to be implemented by specialized subclasses. Methods
believed to be more generic were implemented in an attempt to satify most
implementation needs but nothing prevents a subclass from overriding them as
well (again, flexibility and extensibility are design goals). Most implemented
methods rely on the implementation of an unimplemented method. For example, the
method getStringValue from InstanceMetadata class, which has indeed been
implemented and is meant to retrieve a metadata value as a string, internally
calls the getRawValue method which was NOT implemented and is meant to query
the internal data structures for the requested metadata value and return it as
is. Used in that way, an application would not benefit much from the already
implemented methods. On the other hand, by simply overriding the getRawValue
method on a specialized class to deal with the intrinsics of its internal data
structures, this very application would now benefit from all already implemented
methods.
The following code snippet tries to illustrate the idea:
// -- InstanceMetadata.js
class InstanceMetadata {
[ ... ]
getRawValue(tagOrProperty, defaultValue) {
// Please implement this method in a specialized subclass...
}
[ ... ]
getStringValue(tagOrProperty, index, defaultValue) {
let rawValue = this.getRawValue(tagOrProperty, '');
// parse the returned value into a string...
[ ... ]
return stringValue;
}
[ ... ]
}
// -- MyFancyAppInstanceMetadata.js
class MyFancyAppInstanceMetadata extends InstanceMetadata {
// Overriding this method will make all methods implemented in the super class
// that rely on it to be immediately available...
getRawValue(tagOrProperty, defaultValue) {
let rawValue;
// retrieve raw value from internal data structures...
[ ... ]
return rawValue;
}
}
// -- main.js
[ ... ]
let sopInstaceMetadata = new MyFancyAppInstanceMetadata(myInternalData);
if (sopInstaceMetadata instanceof MyFancyAppInstanceMetadata) { // true
// this code will be executed...
}
if (sopInstaceMetadata instanceof InstanceMetadata) { // also true
// this code will also be executed...
}
// The following will also work since the internal "getRawValue" call inside
// "getStringValue" method will now be satisfied... (thanks to the override)
let patientName = sopInstaceMetadata.getStringValue('PatientName', '');
[ ... ]
Copyright © 2016 nucleushealth™. All rights reserved