Small updates
This commit is contained in:
parent
f56bed2aa4
commit
4d219bdaca
@ -8,18 +8,17 @@ Why do we write tests?
|
||||
|
||||
- Increase confidance
|
||||
|
||||
You're testing implementation details if:
|
||||
|
||||
- Your test does something that the consumer of your code would never do.
|
||||
- IE. Using a private function
|
||||
- A refactor can break your tests
|
||||
|
||||
## Kinds of Tests
|
||||
|
||||
| Test Type | Speed | Cost |
|
||||
| --------- | -------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| Static | :rocket: Instant | :money_with_wings: |
|
||||
| Unit | :airplane: Very Fast | :money_with_wings::money_with_wings: |
|
||||
Test's buy us confidence, but not all tests are created equal. Each kind of test
|
||||
has a different cost to write and maintain. More costly tests
|
||||
|
||||
| Test Type | Example | Speed | Cost |
|
||||
| ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| Static | `addNumbers(1, '2')` was called with a `string`, `int` was expected. | :rocket: Instant | :money_with_wings: |
|
||||
| Unit | `addNumbers(1, 2)` returns expected result `3` | :airplane: Fast | :money_with_wings::money_with_wings: |
|
||||
| Integration | | :running: Okay | :money_with_wings::money_with_wings::money_with_wings: |
|
||||
| End-to-end | When I click "Sign In", the page navigates to the dashboard. | :turtle: Slow | :money_with_wings::money_with_wings::money_with_wings::money_with_wings: |
|
||||
|
||||
### Static Code Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
@ -38,6 +37,19 @@ Static code analysis can't test business logic.
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
#### What should be unit tested?
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the top level exports. Anything that is exposed as public API should have
|
||||
unit tests. These are th
|
||||
|
||||
#### What should NOT be unit tested?
|
||||
|
||||
You're testing implementation details if:
|
||||
|
||||
- Your test does something that the consumer of your code would never do.
|
||||
- IE. Using a private function
|
||||
- A refactor can break your tests
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Tests
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
@ -49,9 +61,8 @@ Static code analysis can't test business logic.
|
||||
## Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [Assert(js) Conf 2018 Talks][assert-js-talks]
|
||||
- [Write tests. Not too many. Mostly integration.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLV5CVI1eNcJgNqzNwcs4UKrlJdhfDjshf) -
|
||||
Kent C. Dodds
|
||||
-
|
||||
- [Write tests. Not too many. Mostly integration.][kent-talk] - Kent C. Dodds
|
||||
- [I see your point, but…][gleb-talk] - Gleb Bahmutov
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Links
|
||||
@ -60,7 +71,11 @@ Static code analysis can't test business logic.
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
|
||||
[eslint-rules]: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/
|
||||
[typescript-docs]: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/home.html
|
||||
<!-- Talks -->
|
||||
[assert-js-talks]: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ66c9_z3umNSrKSb5cmpxdXZcIPNvKGw
|
||||
[kent-talk]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLV5CVI1eNcJgNqzNwcs4UKrlJdhfDjshf
|
||||
[gleb-talk]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FnalKRjpZk
|
||||
<!-- Images -->
|
||||
[testing-trophy]: https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/960723172591992832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E960723172591992832&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fkentcdodds.com%2Fblog%2Fwrite-tests
|
||||
[aaron-square]: https://twitter.com/Carofine247/status/966727489274961920
|
||||
[gleb-pyramid]: https://twitter.com/Carofine247/status/966764532046684160/photo/3
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user